TyG index calculator
Insulin resistance estimated from a standard lipid panel: fasting triglycerides and fasting glucose, no insulin assay required.
Your result
What counts as low, moderate and high
- Below every published cut-off — below 4.65
- Inside the range where the published cut-offs sit — 4.65–4.72
- Above every published cut-off — 4.73 or more
Why an index built from triglycerides
The standard way to estimate insulin resistance from a blood sample is HOMA-IR, and it needs a fasting insulin. Many general practices will not order one, many insurers will not pay for one, and insulin assays are poorly standardised between laboratories anyway.
The TyG index sidesteps all of that. It uses fasting triglycerides and fasting glucose — two values that appear on essentially every routine lipid panel already in your file. Simental-Mendía and colleagues published it in Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders in 2008, validated against the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, which is the reference standard for measuring insulin sensitivity.
The biology behind it is not arbitrary. Insulin normally suppresses the release of fatty acids from fat tissue and the production of triglyceride-rich particles by the liver. When that suppression weakens, fasting triglycerides drift up. Raised triglycerides and raised fasting glucose together are a fingerprint of the same problem.
The formula
TyG is the natural logarithm of fasting triglycerides in mg/dL multiplied by fasting glucose in mg/dL, with the result divided by two. The calculator accepts either unit for both values and converts before computing — triglycerides at 88.57 mg/dL per mmol/L, glucose at 18.0156. The conversion has to happen first, because a logarithm of a product shifts by a constant when the units change, which would move every published cut-off without any visible sign that it had.
Because it is a logarithm, the scale is compressed: the whole meaningful range sits between roughly four and six, and a difference of a tenth is not trivial. That also means the index is insensitive to small measurement noise, which is part of why it reproduces well.
What the thresholds are worth
Less than HbA1c thresholds are, and the page should say so plainly. Rather than pick one number, the middle band above spans the published ones. Its lower edge is the cut-point from the original 2008 paper, which validated the index against HOMA-IR in a Mexican population; its upper edge is the highest well-sourced value, from an Indian cohort scored against metabolic syndrome. The one clamp-validated figure — from the same Mexican group in 2010, measured against the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp, which is the reference standard for insulin sensitivity — sits between them. No professional body has adopted any of the three.
One practical warning, because it silently doubles the answer on other sites: the index is written two ways in the literature. Taking the logarithm of the product and then halving it — the convention this calculator uses, and the one the cut-offs above belong to — gives values in the fours and fives. Halving inside the logarithm instead gives the same index shifted to roughly twice that. Both conventions are correct and their published thresholds differ accordingly, so a result from one compared against a threshold from the other is simply wrong. If a calculator gives you a number near nine and holds it against a threshold near four and a half, close the tab.
What TyG is genuinely good at is ranking. Within one population, a higher TyG reliably marks lower insulin sensitivity, and large cohort studies have linked higher values to later type 2 diabetes and to cardiovascular events. Treating your own value as a position on a scale, tracked over time, is sound. Treating a single reading as a pass or fail is not.
When it does not apply
Triglycerides are the volatile half of the formula. They rise sharply after a meal and after alcohol, so the sample must be genuinely fasting — most laboratories ask for at least eight hours, and alcohol the night before will distort it. Familial hypertriglyceridaemia, untreated hypothyroidism, nephrotic syndrome and some medications raise triglycerides for reasons that have nothing to do with insulin, and TyG cannot tell those apart from insulin resistance.
It is also not a diagnostic test and does not appear in any diagnostic guideline. If fasting insulin is available to you, HOMA-IR is the more direct measure; TyG is the one you can compute from bloods you already have.
Frequently asked questions
Is the TyG index better than HOMA-IR?
Not better, more available. HOMA-IR measures insulin directly and is the more direct estimate. TyG uses two values already on a routine lipid panel and does not depend on an insulin assay, which makes it reproducible between laboratories in a way HOMA-IR is not.
What is a normal TyG index?
No body has set one. The boundary shown on this page is the cut-point from the original validation study, and other cohorts publish somewhat different values. The source is named under the scale.
Do I need to fast?
Yes, and it matters more here than for most tests, because triglycerides rise substantially after eating. At least eight hours, and no alcohol the evening before.
My triglycerides are in mmol/L. Does the calculator handle that?
Yes. Switch the unit next to the field and it converts before computing. The formula itself is defined in mg/dL, so the conversion happens first.
Read next
Other calculators
- HOMA-IR and QUICKI Fasting glucose plus fasting insulin, in either unit, with the bands and their caveats.
- Risk test (no blood test) Eight validated questions that estimate your ten-year risk of type 2 diabetes.
- mg/dL ↔ mmol/L Convert a blood sugar reading between the two units, with the reference ranges.
This calculator is educational and is not a diagnosis. It cannot replace a blood test or a conversation with your doctor. If a result worries you, or if you have symptoms, take the numbers to a clinician rather than acting on them alone.