Garam masala

Garam masala

GI 30 · LowGL 0.9 / teaspoon8/10

Low GI

30 GI

GL 0.9 per typical teaspoon (5 g) · GL 17.4 per 100 g

Logi score 8/10
  • Low sugar content
  • Unknown level of processing

Garam masala has a glycemic index of 30 (Low). One typical teaspoon (5 g) adds a glycemic load of 0.9.

Reviewed Aug 6, 2026 · Sources: Logi Nutrition Team (USDA-derived composition, AI-assisted, human-reviewed) · Not medical advice · Report an error

Instead of this

Logi · Manage Insulin Resistance

Lower your blood sugar through smarter food choices

Garam masala is one of the 11,117 foods Logi scores when you photograph a meal — with the portion.

Continue on web
Logi app, food index screen
Portions
PortionGramsGL
1 teaspoon3 g0.6
1 tablespoon10 g1.7

Nutrition Facts (per 100g)

350
Calories
58 g
Carbs
12 g
Protein
10 g
Fat
per 100g
Calories350 kcal
Carbohydrates58 g
Sugars (Total)3 g
Natural3 g
Added0 g
Fiber25 g
Soluble7.5 g
Insoluble17.5 g
Protein12 g
Fat10 g
Saturated2 g
Unsaturated8 g
Sodium80 mg

Processing Level

30%
Minimal
Why this score?
  • Low sugar content
  • High fiber content
  • Low glycemic index
  • Unknown level of processing
  • Quite high caloric content

Allergens

No EU-14 allergen listed

Recipes with Garam masala

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the glycemic index of Garam masala?

Garam masala has a glycemic index of 30 (Low). One typical teaspoon (5 g) has a glycemic load of 0.9; per 100 g the glycemic load is 17.4.

Is Garam masala good for people with insulin resistance?

Garam masala has a low glycemic index (30), making it a good option for people with insulin resistance. It causes a slow, gradual rise in blood sugar.

How does Garam masala affect blood sugar?

Garam masala has a glycemic load of 17.4 per 100g, which indicates a moderate impact on blood sugar levels.

Check Garam masala in the Logi app, with your portion.

Food diary cheat sheet

Free PDF — 3 pages

Your Weekly Food Journal

Track meals, glycemic load & mood. Spot patterns in 3 weeks.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.